Why EFT matters
Card fees scale with basket size. A capped or lower-cost bank-payment method can protect margin on electronics, furniture, travel, B2B and other high-value orders.
Bank payments
Instant EFT and bank-payment methods can reduce card dependency, improve high-ticket margins and serve customers who prefer bank authentication over card checkout.
Card fees scale with basket size. A capped or lower-cost bank-payment method can protect margin on electronics, furniture, travel, B2B and other high-value orders.
Stitch and Ozow are the specialist bank-payment contenders. PayFast offers Instant EFT as part of a broader gateway. Paystack and Peach Payments can fit mixed checkout stacks depending on the store model.
Compare bank coverage, mobile bank authentication, reconciliation, refund paths, failed payment handling and whether the customer leaves your checkout flow.
| Provider | Role | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Stitch | Bank-payment and API-first payments | Developers and high-ticket merchants |
| Ozow | Instant EFT specialist | Stores prioritising bank-to-bank checkout |
| PayFast | Broad gateway with EFT | Merchants wanting many methods in one account |
| Paystack | Full-stack gateway with EFT signal | Modern checkout teams |
| Peach Payments | Full-stack gateway | Scaling merchants needing support |
It can be, especially when EFT fees are capped or when card flat fees and percentage rates make large orders expensive.
Ozow and Stitch are the specialist names to compare first, while PayFast is useful when you want EFT inside a broader gateway.
Yes for many stores. Cards help conversion, while EFT can lower costs on larger baskets.